BJSM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taunton, J E
Right arrow Articles by Zumbo, B D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taunton, J E
Right arrow Articles by Zumbo, B D
Br J Sports Med 2003;37:239-244
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A prospective study of running injuries: the Vancouver Sun Run "In Training" clinics

J E Taunton, M B Ryan, D B Clement, D C McKenzie, D R Lloyd-Smith, B D Zumbo

Allan McGavin Sports Medicine Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Taunton, Allan McGavin Sports Medicine Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z3;
jtaunton{at}interchange.ubc.ca

Objectives: Seventeen running training clinics were investigated to determine the number of injuries that occur in a running programme designed to minimise the injury rate for athletes training for a 10 km race. The relative contributions of factors associated with injury were also reported.

Methods: A total of 844 primarily recreational runners were surveyed in three trials on the 4th, 8th, and 12th week of the 13 week programme of the "In Training" running clinics. Participants were classified as injured if they experienced at least a grade 1 injury—that is, pain only after running. Logistic regression modelling and odds ratio calculation were performed for each sex using the following predictor variables: age, body mass index (BMI), previous aerobic activity, running frequency, predominant running surface, arch height, running shoe age, and concurrent cross training.

Results: Age played an important part in injury in women: being over 50 years old was a risk factor for overall injury, and being less than 31 years was protective against new injury. Running only one day a week showed a non-significant trend for injury risk in men and was a significant risk factor in women and overall injury. A BMI of > 26 kg/m2 was reported as protective for men. Running shoe age also significantly contributed to the injury model. Half of the participants who reported an injury had had a previous injury; 42% of these reported that they were not completely rehabilitated on starting the 13 week training programme. An injury rate of 29.5% was recorded across all training clinics surveyed. The knee was the most commonly injured site.

Conclusions: Although age, BMI, running frequency (days a week), and running shoe age were associated with injury, these results do not take into account an adequate measure of exposure time to injury, running experience, or previous injury and should thus be viewed accordingly. In addition, the reason for the discrepancy in injury rate between these 17 clinics requires further study.


Keywords: running injury; questionnaire; training clinic; body mass index; risk factor




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
Y Thijs, D De Clercq, P Roosen, and E Witvrouw
Gait-related intrinsic risk factors for patellofemoral pain in novice recreational runners
Br. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2008; 42(6): 466 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. Brushoj, K. Larsen, E. Albrecht-Beste, M. B. Nielsen, F. Loye, and P. Holmich
Prevention of Overuse Injuries by a Concurrent Exercise Program in Subjects Exposed to an Increase in Training Load: A Randomized Controlled Trial of 1020 Army Recruits
Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2008; 36(4): 663 - 670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
I. Buist, S. W. Bredeweg, W. van Mechelen, K. A. P. M. Lemmink, G.-J. Pepping, and R. L. Diercks
No Effect of a Graded Training Program on the Number of Running-Related Injuries in Novice Runners: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2008; 36(1): 33 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
R N van Gent, D Siem, M van Middelkoop, A G van Os, S M A Bierma-Zeinstra, B W Koes, and J. E Taunton
Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: a systematic review * COMMENTARY
Br. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2007; 41(8): 469 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. J. Butler, I. S. Davis, and J. Hamill
Interaction of Arch Type and Footwear on Running Mechanics
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2006; 34(12): 1998 - 2005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
B M Pluim, J B Staal, G E Windler, and N Jayanthi
Tennis injuries: occurrence, aetiology, and prevention.
Br. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2006; 40(5): 415 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. J. Rauh, T. D. Koepsell, F. P. Rivara, A. J. Margherita, and S. G. Rice
Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Injuries among High School Cross-Country Runners
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2006; 163(2): 151 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine