HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stewart, D R Articles by Burden, S B Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stewart, D R Articles by Burden, S B

Does generalised ligamentous laxity increase seasonal incidence of injuries in male first division club rugby players?

¹ Waikato Institute of Technology, Centre for Sport and Exercise Science, Private Bag 3036, Hamilton 2020, New Zealand
² Waikato Institute of Technology, Hamilton, New Zealand

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Mr Stewart
Waikato Institute of Technology, Centre for Sport and Exercise Science, Private Bag 3036, Hamilton 2020, New Zealand; dwane_stewart{at}yahoo.co.nz

Objectives: To investigate if ligamentous laxity increases seasonal incidence of injury in male first division club rugby players, and to determine if strength protects against injury in hypermobile and tight players.

Methods: Fifty one male first division club rugby players were examined for ligamentous laxity using the Beighton-Horan assessment and graded with an overall laxity score ranging from 0 (tight) to 9 (hyperlax). Each participant was classified into a group determined by their laxity score: tight (0–3), hypermobile (4–6), or excessively hypermobile (7–9). The incidence of joint injuries was recorded prospectively throughout the rugby season and correlated with laxity score. Differences between the groups were analysed.

Results: The overall prevalence of generalised joint hypermobility was 24% (12/51). The incidence of injuries was significantly higher in hypermobile (116.7 per 1000 hours) than tight (43.6 per 1000 hours) players (p = 0.034). There were no significant differences in peak strength between the hypermobile and tight groups.

Conclusions: The laxity of the players may explain the differences in injury rates between these groups. Peak strength does not protect the hypermobile joint against injury. It appears that hypermobility may cause an increase in the injury rate of male first division club rugby players.

Keywords: rugby; incidence; injuries; ligamentous laxity; strength

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D M Schick, M G Molloy, and J P Wiley Injuries during the 2006 Women's Rugby World Cup Br. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2008; 42(6): 447 - 451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Ligamentous laxity and rugby injuries Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2004; 63(10): 1196 - 1196. [Full Text] [PDF]