BJSM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 July 2008

Br J Sports Med. Published Online First: 14 September 2007. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2007.037929
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
bjsm.2007.037929v1
42/7/585    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, D. W
Right arrow Articles by Nosaka, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, D. W
Right arrow Articles by Nosaka, K.

Paper

Work And Peak Torque During Eccentric Exercise Do Not Predict Changes In Markers Of Muscle Damage

Dale W Chapman 1*, Michael J Newton 1, Zanial Zainuddin 2, Paul Sacco 3 and Kazunori Nosaka 1

1 School of Exercise, Biomedical and Health Sciences. Edith Cowan University, Australia
2 Department of Sports Science, University Technology of Malaysia, Malaysia
3 School of Health and Bioscience, University of East London, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: d.chapman{at}ecu.edu.au.

Accepted 28 August 2007


*   Abstract

Objectives: Large inter-subject variability in responses to eccentric exercise has been reported. This study investigated the hypothesis that the variability of changes in indirect markers of exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) would be explained by work performed and/or torque generated during eccentric exercise. Methods: Subjects (n=53) performed 60 maximal eccentric actions of the elbow flexors on an isokinetic dynamometer that forcibly extended the elbow joint from 60° to 180° at a constant velocity (90°·s-1). Markers of EIMD included maximal voluntary isometric contraction torque at 90° elbow flexion (MVC), range of motion, plasma creatine kinase activity and muscle soreness. Measurements were taken 2 days before, immediately after, and 1-4 days post-exercise. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to examine relationships between exercise parameters (total work, change in total work, torque produced during exercise, change in peak torque) and markers of EIMD. Results: Large inter-subject variability was evident for both work and torque during exercise, and changes in all markers of EIMD. Contrary to the hypothesis, total work (normalised for individual pre-exercise MVC) did not correlate significantly with any markers of EIMD, with the exception of MVC (r = 0.3). Total work performed and changes in total work showed higher correlations with some markers, but no r-values exceeded 0.4. Normalised exercise torque and the changes in peak torque during exercise were not correlated with changes in MVC, nor other markers. Conclusion: These results suggest the large inter-subject variability in responses to eccentric exercise is not associated with work performed or torque generated during eccentric exercise.

Key Words: delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS), elbow flexors, isometric strength, plasma creatine kinase activity







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine